Алексей Каптерев (kapterev) wrote,
Алексей Каптерев
kapterev

Вот, пожалуйста, человек не видет "никаких проблем с государством, которое является обычным юридическим лицом, вроде очень крупной корпорации." У кого-нибудь есть жедание подискутировать? Анатолий, это, кажется, твоя любимая тема. Я только одного не понимаю, если это "обычное юрлицо", зачем и кому оно в таком виде нужно?

Кстати говоря, вот попалось тут на глаза любопытное исследование: страшная правда о приватизации в Латинской Америке. Executive summary для тех, кому лень читать:
There are four main results. First, the increased profitability of privatized firms is not explained by sample selection biases. Second, in the quest to identify the sources of increased profitability after privatization, we find little evidence that validates concerns of generalized market power abuses, exploitation of workers and lack of fiscal benefits. Third, the manner in which privatization is carried out matters. Transparency and homogeneity in procedures, speed, and limited restructuring prior to privatization lead to better outcomes and less room for corruption and discretion. Finally, privatization’s success is enhanced by two complementary policies: re-regulation or deregulation of industries previously shielded from competitive forces; and an effective corporate governance framework that facilitates privatized firms’ access to capital at lower costs. Overall, the empirical record shows that privatization leads to increased profitability and productivity, firm restructuring, fiscal benefits, output growth and even quality improvements.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments